NFTRH 391 Out Now
This week we abbreviated to a review of limit and/or trend change points in several markets, further discussion of inflation and what needs to be in place to call an…
This week we abbreviated to a review of limit and/or trend change points in several markets, further discussion of inflation and what needs to be in place to call an…
Note: A reminder that I will mostly be away from the markets on Thursday and Friday. This update is an extensive review of where markets stand now. We will update the situation on Sunday with an abbreviated NFTRH 391.
Precious Metals
HUI made it to the resistance line and the projected zone of 202 to 211 off the consolidation triangle (ref. daily chart reviewed in this update last week). From the ‘bottom line’ of that update: “Watch the gold miners. A breakout (on a weekly close) here would signal a new leg to an initial target of 211.”
The Silver-Gold ratio (SGR) has been a primary indicator we have awaited for a confirmation that a phase of overt inflationary effects may get under way. This would have implications for everything from commodities to resource based economies (like many emerging markets). It is one of the ‘market-based’ inflation indicators we have discussed; a metallic “credit spread” as Bob Hoye calls it. When silver leads, price increases across many other asset classes are more likely.
On April 7 in pre-market we had an extensive update on gold, silver and especially, the miners. This update is now public for your review. If you check it out…
I'm leaving the gold CoT out because it did not change much from its bearish state.* Silver on the other hand, saw another week of net improvement as of Tuesday's…
In the weekend report we used weekly charts to show that gold has taken a good chunk of its apparent price risk out as key support was not too far away beginning in the 1180’s. Silver had lost the breakout above the would-be supportive EMA 55 and HUI was well above key support, now 140 (lateral support at October highs) to 148 (gently rising EMA 55). We have also been noting 211 as the point that greatly improves the prospects of a bull market, technically (I think the probabilities are that one is in progress, but the technicals are what they are).
The theme is that the pullbacks and/or corrections, will come. The terror attack in Brussels may have been the flashpoint for such a pullback. As noted in a public post, gold’s rise on the fear or ‘safe haven’ bid (I shorted it) is not a good thing for the gold price beyond the flashpoint. The only terrorism that matters for gold is Central Banking terror committed upon currencies and financial systems.
Jordan Roy Byrne and Steve Saville are people that I think are highly knowledgeable when it comes to gold and the gold mining sector. So this is not a post taking a shot at anyone. Jordan focuses nearly exclusively on the gold sector and in my opinion does a good job either being right, or getting right when adjustment is needed. He moves forward without hype, bias or ego. Steve Saville is more diversified and a real sharp pencil in the drawer in his own right.
This morning Saville highlights Jordan’s video discussion of the gold Commitments of Traders alignment and why it is not necessarily to be feared in the manner that a certain hyperbolic technical analyst out there (30,000 [CoT] coffins anyone?) would have enthralled gold bugs believe. Jordan’s video is here.
I purposely keep my public writing about the gold sector limited because there is enough noise out there in this overly noisy segment of the market. But in NFTRH, we have been noting that if this is a bull market (folks, it’s not technically confirmed no matter what the pompom brigade would have you think) that “bear market rules are different than bull market rules” and so it is very possible that the current bearish CoT does not have to mean anything near what it has meant during the 2011-2015 bear market. Indeed, in my opinion the worst thing about it is not the net short Commercials or the net long Specs, it is the over bullish little guy (small Specs).
While having all due caution in the face of the negative CoT buildup, the graphs below and the comments after them were when we began speculating about a possible change to “bull market rules” with respect to the CoT. We reached back to the start of the bull market early last decade for reference. It should be noted that Jordan subscribes to NFTRH, I assume for its coverage of the overall macro markets.
I am trying to avoid sounding territorial, but in this racket sometimes it’s about not being too shy to toot your own horn. Toot toot…
From NFTRH 384 on February 28:
If I may affix my tin foil hat for a moment, let’s recall that in 2012 as the Fed announced full on un-sanitized QE(3) to take over from the expiring Operation Twist, the precious metals complex exploded higher. Many, including myself thought this policy would prove bullish. But that view was wrong because the CoT said it was wrong.
Because I like overly simple pictures to help me counteract hype everywhere I see it, especially in the Silver Bug, Inflation Bug and Commodity Guru communities... This chart (and its…
A whopping 49 pages and not nearly as difficult to digest as that sounds. Lots of charts and graphics populate what I think is a very cohesive report managing multiple…
Using the ETFs, we find gold in the nose of what would normally be thought of as a bullish Triangle (continuation) pattern. However, we'll note here what NFTRH has been…
By Monetary Metals Gold-Silver Ratio Breakout The gold to silver ratio moved up very sharply this week, +4.2%. How did this happen? It was not because of a move in…
Just another in a continuum of reports that have been in line with a macro theme seeing a loss of momentum in the US stock market and potential bottoming in…
[edit] I am glad I write an in-depth financial market report every weekend because it forces me to do work that sometimes adds context to these quickie posts and in-week…